Received: from relay5.UU.NET (relay5.UU.NET [192.48.96.15]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id MAA14801 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Thu, 25 Jan 1996 12:19:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay5.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQaabk08200; Thu, 25 Jan 1996 12:09:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA26654; Thu, 25 Jan 1996 12:08:39 -0500
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 12:08:39 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <199601251701.MAA09882@grtk>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: nkelly@grtk.com (Nathan Kelly - GTC)
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: The PAR and Premier ?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
Hi all;
I was wondering if anybody is using the PAR (pc version)
with Adobe Premier? I'm a non professional user of lighwave and i
would like to be able to edit a sequence of anim's with software. I
know about razor but it's out of my price range. I was wondering if
the PAR codec worked with it OK and if you had to make large AVIs on
you nonpar drive before editing? also are there any bugs with
premier? I know that there are at least 2 other packages cheaper
than premier and was wondering if the small savings on the package